well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

Answered by R.P. Singh , an ibibo Master, at 8:41 PM on July 22, 2008

well , I am feeling HAPPY to answer your question , I would like to suggest you to access the source site if it's available , for more information.
well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.


For more information , please do visit source site:


Hope it will help you out.

Answered by Uttam , an ibibo Master, at 6:39 PM on July 21, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

Answered by Yash , an ibibo Master, at 9:06 AM on July 21, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

Answered by Rocky , an ibibo Master, at 9:05 PM on July 19, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

Answered by .... ..... , an ibibo Master, at 8:19 PM on July 16, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

Answered by Raksha , an ibibo Master, at 8:43 AM on July 15, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

linux disadvantges -still has a few security flaws, a common misconception that linux is "hard" to use

Answered by Ni .. , an ibibo Master, at 8:11 PM on July 13, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

linux disadvantges -still has a few security flaws, a common misconception that linux is "hard" to use

Answered by Romi , an ibibo Master, at 11:33 AM on July 09, 2008

NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and


Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

Answered by Madhurima , an ibibo Master, at 12:38 PM on July 05, 2008

well, NET takes code written in VB, V C++, C#, etc. and
> compiles that code into a bytecode. Then, the bytecode is compiled
> native windows code... Right?
>
> It's possible to do this with a Java compiler, right? To compile java
> bytecode into native code...
>
> So my question is, what's the advantage to using .NET as opposed to
> Java?

Java is multi-platform from the start and Microsoft used the idea for their
own product, so I would trust Java more.
Besides I really think Java is the greatest thing

advantages -unix based, more stable than, secure windows, cool looking hardware.

disadvantges -freebsd based, less stable than linux, uncompatible hardware, worst interface out there, expensive.

windows advantages - is used by lot's of people.
disadvantages -crashes, insecure, buggy, expensive.

linux advantages - very fast, the good parts of unix design, stable, many choices for a desktop including GNOME about the best interface in the world, can run on both cheap pc hardware and cool looking mac hardware, free.

linux disadvantges -still has a few security flaws, a common misconception that linux is "hard" to use

Answered by satyaiitk , an ibibo Master, at 7:06 PM on July 03, 2008